��ñ��

Corporal Punishment in U.S. ��ñ�� Schools: 2025 Update

Every parent, student and educator considering a boarding school needs to understand how discipline is applied and legally regulated. While much attention focuses on day schools, boarding schools must also navigate discipline practices—including the controversial use of physical punishment. This article explores the current status of corporal punishment in U.S. schools (including private and boarding settings), touches on boarding-school specific issues, updates the 2025 policy landscape, presents new research, and offers insights for families evaluating boarding school environments.

What we mean by “corporal punishment”

In the context of K-12 schools, corporal punishment is defined as any physical force exerted on a student by school personnel intended to correct behaviour—traditionally paddling, spanking, or striking with an object.Historically, this has been applied in both public and private schools in certain states. While most schools today rely on suspension, expulsion, restorative practices or behaviour contracts, corporal punishment remains legal in some jurisdictions.

For boarding schools—where students live on site and are under supervision 24/7—the discipline environment can differ from day schools and requires particular scrutiny. The boarding context raises questions about oversight, residential rules, staff training and the overall culture of discipline.

Legal and policy landscape in 2025

As of 2025, the legal status of corporal punishment varies significantly by state. According to the National Education Association (NEA), 17 states currently permit corporal punishment in public schools, and additional states have not explicitly banned it.A map by the Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) shows that many of the states where it remains legal are in the South and Southwest.

For parents and educators, this means that whether corporal punishment is permitted depends heavily on the state law and the school’s charter or policy. Private boarding schools may operate under their own codes of conduct, but simply being private does not guarantee prohibition.

Recent federal guidance also adds context. In April 2025 the United States Department of Education (US ED) and United States Department of Justice reiterated the need for non-discriminatory discipline policies and style="text-decoration-line: none;"> While this guidance does not directly ban corporal punishment, it signals greater scrutiny of discipline modalities, especially where racial or disability disparities are identified.

Why this matters in the boarding school context

��ñ�� schools present unique discipline dynamics. Students live, eat, study and sleep on campus, often under the supervision of faculty and residential staff. The potential for after-hours misbehaviour, peer interactions in dormitories, and campus-wide community norms means discipline approaches can have a far-reaching impact on student well-being.

Key concerns for boarding schools include:

• Residential oversight: Staff on campus overnight may enforce rules beyond classroom hours, so methods of discipline—including physical ones—should be clearly spelled out in the student handbook and subject to oversight.

• Consent and parental notification: In jurisdictions where corporal punishment is permitted, many states require written parental consent or notification. Family choice about boarding schools may hinge on clarity around who controls discipline.

• Equity and student demographics: Research shows that students from historically marginalised groups—Black students, students with disabilities, boys—are disproportionately impacted by corporal punishment. ��ñ�� schools must account for this risk in their discipline policies and training.

• School climate and psychological impact: The broader research base increasingly suggests that corporal punishment is linked to negative psychological and developmental outcomes, such as anxiety, depression and reduced academic engagement. In a boarding school setting, where students live outside home and supervision is constant, these effects may be amplified if discipline is handled poorly.

What the latest research tells us

In recent years the research spotlight has intensified. A key 2025 report from the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that corporal punishment remains widespread globally and carries significant risks to children’s health and development.

In the U.S., though overall prevalence has dropped, the practice still occurs. For example, a 2021 – 22 national review found that while 96 % of schools did not report using corporal punishment, the remaining 4 % still did.In addition, the racial and disability-based disparities in who receives corporal punishment remain acute.

Another 2025 policy article in the journal CounterPunch estimated over 100,000 U.S. students per year continue to receive corporal punishment.

For boarding schools, the implication is clear: discipline methods matter not only for legal compliance but for student mental health, retention, community culture and equitable treatment.

Current status and trends for parents to monitor (2025)

Here are several key trends and practical questions for families evaluating boarding-school discipline policies in 2025:

1. State law updates: Several states are actively considering or passing legislation to ban or restrict corporal punishment in schools. For example, news coverage in 2025 notes bills introduced in states like West Virginia to allow corporal punishment or tighten oversight. Families should check whether the boarding school is in a state where corporal punishment remains legal and whether any recent legislation applies.

2. School policy transparency: A well-run boarding school will clearly describe its discipline policy in the student handbook, including whether physical discipline is permitted, what kinds of infractions trigger it, whether parental consent is required and whether staff receive training in alternatives. Ask the admissions office for the latest discipline policy and any annual data on disciplinary actions.

3. Focus on alternative discipline and restorative practice: Many schools are moving away from physical punishment toward restorative justice, behaviour contracts, peer mediation, counselling and incentives for positive behaviour. Evidence suggests these alternatives improve school climate and student outcomes. Parents should ask what alternatives the school uses and how frequently.

4. Data on discipline-disparities: Good schools track discipline by demographics—race/ethnicity, gender, disability status—and adjust practices if disparities emerge. As noted by legal advocacy groups, discipline disparities remain a civil-rights concern.

5. Residential staff training: Because boarding schools operate 24/7, staff beyond classroom teachers (dorm staff, residential assistants) must also receive training in behaviour management, including de-escalation, culturally responsive practices and child-development-based responses. Families should ask how the school addresses staff professional development in these areas.

6. Parental involvement and appeal processes: For serious disciplinary actions, including those involving physical punishment (if permitted) boarding schools should provide transparent grievance and appeal processes, ensuring students’ rights and voices are respected.

Real-world illustration

Consider a hypothetical boarding school in a state where corporal punishment remains legal, such as some Southern states (for example, case data indicates states like Mississippi and Alabama have higher incidence historically). Research shows in those states more than one-third of schools used corporal punishment in 2011–12.If a boarding school in that state has legacy discipline policies that permit paddling in the dorm context, a family might want to ask: Is this actually still practiced? If so, under what conditions? Are parents given consent forms?

Another illustrative case: a boarding school in a state that has banned corporal punishment. The school must ensure its internal policy aligns with best practices for non-violent discipline and monitors any behaviour that might replicate physical punishment (such as extreme seclusion or restraint). Given the WHO’s findings that physical punishment correlates with developmental harm, schools committed to social-emotional learning will often use alternatives.

Recommendations for families considering boarding schools

When visiting or researching boarding schools, consider the following checklist around discipline:

• Request the student handbook and residential discipline policy; review the section on physical discipline and ask whether paddling or spanking is explicitly permitted, what the parental consent process is, and how many incidents occurred in the past year.

• Ask for data on disciplinary actions—how many students received major vs minor infractions, how many suspensions or expulsions, and whether the school monitors disparity by race, gender or disability.

• Inquire about staff training—what training residential staff and faculty receive on behaviour management, de-escalation and trauma-informed discipline.

• Discuss alternative discipline philosophies—does the school implement restorative justice, peer mediation, behaviour contracts, or social-emotional learning approaches? How does it minimise use of punitive measures?

• Clarify the appeal or grievance process—how a student or parent can challenge a disciplinary decision, including one involving physical intervention.

• Visit the dorm environment after hours (if possible) and talk with current students and parents about the school climate. Ask: how does the school handle mis-behaviour in the dorm? Is the process fair, transparent and consistent?

Conclusion

In 2025, the use of corporal punishment in U.S. boarding and day schools remains a critical issue—legal in a significant number of states, practice declining but still present, and increasingly scrutinised by researchers, advocates and policymakers. For boarding schools, where residential supervision heightens the impact of discipline policies, transparent, well-articulated, and equity-driven discipline systems are vital.

Parents and students evaluating boarding schools should prioritise clarity around the school’s discipline philosophy, staff training, alternatives to physical punishment, and data on how discipline is applied across student populations. Choosing a school means understanding not only academic offerings and facilities but also the day-to-day culture of behaviour, supervision and community life.